진입가로 다시 돌아오는 주식 때문에 매매 수익률이 엉망입니다 😣

Take some partials on extensions to help pay for the risk. Otherwise you have to just follow your plan when you took the trade and trust your stop. There's no magic answer.

Move stop to breakeven after 1R profit. Let remaining run with trailing stop. Accept pullbacks as normal. Size smaller so pullbacks don't scare you. Review journal: do entries often return to entry? Refine confirmation. Trust your edge. Fear of losing profit > fear of missing gains. Partial profits help psychology. Scale out, don't all-in or all-out. Good luck. This phase passes with experience. Stick to rules.

hmmm, taking profit before it goes back to entry?

You need to figure out which exit strategy works best for your strategy. That's all you can do in this game.

use runable ai to automate selling half at 1R and trailing by structure, so you remove emotion, prove the plan works with data, and make breakeven feel painless

take partials, or exit full and re-enter if you believe in it.

This is called money management. And you should take profit sooner. Use a stop loss

taking profits early because a trade pulls back to your entry isn't a discipline issue, it's just biology. your brain processes floating profit as 'your money', and when it drops, your amygdala feels it as a physical robbery. your prefrontal cortex shuts down and you cut early to escape the anxiety, ruining your risk to reward. out of curiosity, is your original profit target based on a mathematically proven backtest, or do you just close when the visual pressure gets too high?

How are you trading?

There's so many tools at your disposal, each impacting your strategy differently.

Do you want to get stronger entries so maybe the exit management can be looser?

Do you want super tight exit management so bad entries are papercuts instead of deep cuts?

Remember: They usually oppose each other.

Tight exit management (what it sounds like you are begging for) can prevent what you describe but it can also prevent what you hope happens. The tighter the exit management, the less room you give the ticker to breathe and grow.

Example: Buy random stock. Watch it go up 1R or 1.5R or 2R and then watch it bleed itself dry so it closes at entry or below. You go from hundreds or thousands UP to break even or even slightly negative.

Well, you can attack this many ways.

First: Set TP1 and TP2 and maybe even TP3 (Take Profit level 1, 2, 3, etc). So if you hit TP1, sell 25-50% of your stake. This locks you into an almost guaranteed profitability spot. Then if it bleeds dry, you already sold half your position so you're going to be up. Flip side is you have 50% of the position in case it moonshots vertical.

Second: Tighten your entry quality. Better/stronger entry SHOULD equal less need for super tight exit management because that ticker should be solid enough to survive intraday volitivity and reversals. However, this is where you'll need diamond hands in case it reverses and you find yourself negative. If it's truly a great entry, it SHOULD (I've said this word a few times) survive the day and finish green.

Third: Tighten your exit management. Set rules for stops and taking profit. Ratchet up your stops so that as your equity (P&L) increases, so too does your stop loss. That way you can only ever lose so much but never go negative. This however can prevent truly great winners from running because your exits will be so tight that even a wobble might trigger you to bail only to see it gain 1-3% within 30 mins of you exiting.

Fourth: Certain stocks act in unison to other's or the current regime or trend. Some are inverse. Some act a certain way during certain hours. Learn this.

Fifth: Weight your entry. A leveraged 3x ETF isn't the same as a normal ETF. So if you want to risk x$ or x% then you shouldn't have that weighted identically across the board because not all symbols are the same across the board.

Sixth: Longs stairstep up to profitability (usually) while shorts elevator down to profitability (usually). What that means is longs typically need extra time to develop while shorts are usually violent and immediate. It might take you 2 hours for a good long trade to really get it's legs under it to ride to either end of day or take profit. It might take a few minutes for a short to do the same. We've all seen the charts, we all know this is as close to a universal rule than most other rules.

Stopping there because this is so long. But there's sooooo many options. You need to do a few things and I can't stress the first one enough:

First: Use your brain, not AI. AI can process a ton of data instantly but it can not think. If you overly rely and trust AI, then just give me your money. You'll lose everything you own both ways but at least I'll have fun with it. The market will just absorb your loss.

Second: Backtest the ever living fuck out of your strategy so you can see if it even works.

Third: Once backtesting and tweaking proves optimized, forward test it to make sure it works outside of the sterile backtest environment. Anyone can make a trading simulation look amazing when they model it to a known condition (backtesting), but it's a different beast when you forward test it and see how it reacts to market conditions you didn't optimize it for. Hindsight is 20/20 and a backtest is exactly that: Hindsight. When you start looking at the unknown, you can't rely on perfect knowledge anymore.

Again, more but stopping. Sorry all for the wall of freaking text.

>Seeing +1000 P/L then it goes back to entry is almost traumatizing

If there is ANY outcome to a trade that is that emotionally intense, you are trading way too big. It sounds like you are still learning, so you should be trading a size where the P/L swings in an individual trade are pretty close to emotionally neutral.