매달 실제 수확 수익을 주는 토큰, 사시겠어요? 🌳

No. ROI is mostly too low.

Interesting idea, but this is where execution matters way more than the concept.

Tokenizing real yield isn’t new — the hard part is trust and transparency. People won’t buy just because it’s “backed by trees,” they’ll want:

* Proof the assets actually exist
* Clear link between revenue → token holders
* Legal structure (who owns what if things go wrong?)

On pricing, stability usually doesn’t come from mechanics alone. If the yield is real and consistent, the price tends to anchor itself around expected returns. Buybacks can help, but if they’re the main support, it starts to look artificial.

Personally, I’d only consider it if:

* Yield distribution is transparent and verifiable
* There’s a clear model (like dividends, not vague rewards)
* Risk factors are clearly explained (weather, operations, etc.)

Real yield > hype, but people have been burned enough in crypto that they’ll need more than a good idea to trust it.

Hello.

If each token represents a specific tree the price would be determined by supply and demand Bases on the tree production, I suggest turning each specifically tree into an nft so the backing is direct instead of doing a generic token supposedly backed by those trees but that we can't trust you to not make fractional reserve or to not reduce or increase the amount of tokens without backing it by tree production. If you made it as nfts directly backed by the trees and I see the production of the tree to be good enough I would buy and hold a few.

Buybacks don't matter if every token is backed by an actual tree since you don't have any reason to manipulate supply, you would only buy back them if you want to keep the production for yourself.

Scam