💡 계좌 세 번 터지고 나서야 '큰 그림'이 보였습니다

This is a solid breakdown, especially the part about expectations vs outcomes. A lot of people talk about fundamentals as if they’re static, when the real move almost always happens at the point where expectations crack.
One thing I’d add from experience is that the “warehouse burst” phase usually isn’t about not understanding the market. It’s about misaligning timeframe, psychology, and risk with how fast information actually gets priced in. You can be right on macro and still bleed if your execution window is too noisy or your size doesn’t forgive variance.
Your point about comparative thinking between currencies is important. Markets don’t move in isolation, and treating pairs as relative systems instead of standalone assets changes how you frame risk. That alone filters out a lot of bad trades.
I also like that you didn’t oversell precision. The idea of ignoring fluctuations smaller than your cycle is something more traders need to internalize. Most damage happens from reacting to noise that never mattered in the first place.
Curious how you personally define your “cycle” now; time-based, structure-based, or volatility-based?

big picture click is real. most blowups come from trading noise against a higher tf bias. once u align cycle + size the game slows way down